02. September 2026

Dr. Landry Charrier discusses in a FOCUS op-ed how Germany might respond to a President Le Pen Dr. Landry Charrier discusses in a FOCUS op-ed how Germany might respond to a President Le Pen

In an op-ed for Focus, published on 31 August 2026, Prof. Dr. Landry Charrier discusses the possibility of a Marine Le Pen election victory in 2027 and the question of how Germany should respond. He explains why Le Pen would most likely be limited in her ability to act and argues in favor of maintaining relations with France and focusing on strengthened European cooperation.

Dr. Landry Charrier
Dr. Landry Charrier © CASSIS
Download all images in original size The impression in connection with the service is free, while the image specified author is mentioned.
Please fill out this field using the example format provided in the placeholder.
The phone number will be handled in accordance with GDPR.

In light of Marine Le Pen’s rising poll numbers ahead of the 2027 French presidential election, concerns are growing in Germany about the collapse of the Franco-German engine and, ultimately, the European Union. To guard against a takeover by the National Rally, some quarters are calling for “de-risking” with regard to France. However, this position is countered by the argument that while a Le Pen victory would indeed cause significant upheaval, it would not necessarily lead to a break with the EU. Landry Charrier explains which factors play a role in this.

Two key points are cited: First, France’s high national debt limits the financial leeway for a sustained confrontational course toward Brussels, as an aggressive stance could be penalized by rising interest rates on the financial markets—as evidenced by the recent multi-year high in yields on ten-year French government bonds. Second, the fragmentation of the National Assembly would limit the room for maneuver of a potential President Le Pen. Even after new elections, an absolute majority is by no means certain.

In the event of so-called “cohabitation”—where the executive and legislative branches are dominated by different political forces—additional constitutional uncertainties would arise, as the division of powers in the areas of foreign and defense policy is not clearly defined.

At the same time, attention is turning to Germany itself: According to Charrier, the Federal Republic has so far tended to use its growing military and financial strength for national rather than European purposes. This situation is being viewed with concern in Paris and other European capitals, especially as the U.S. is increasingly withdrawing from its leadership role in Europe. A potential success by the AfD in the state election in Saxony-Anhalt is also seen as a sign of Germany’s growing political unpredictability.

The conclusion is that while “de-risking” may suggest security in the short term, increased mutual dependence could represent a more sustainable safeguard in light of an emerging European power vacuum.

You can find the entire article (in German) here.

Dr. Landry Charrier is a Senior Fellow at the Center for Advanced Security, Strategic and Integration Studies (CASSIS).

Wird geladen